untitled
NEW! Upgrade to Pro Hosting and receive Ad-Free Webtools + More!

 

There are two terms used that have been passed down through the ages that we would like to examine. The first thought is that the return of Christ is imminent i.e. it can occur at any time. The second is that we should occupy until the Lord returns. I wanted to share on this because I recently posted an article that I wrote to encourage folks who had put their eyes on a rapture date that had just passed. In the paper I stated that we are to occupy until the Lord comes, and in this way we were living in a posture of faith. I want to tweak ever so slightly what I wrote in that offering through this writing.

 

I did something that I should not have done – and that is I repeated what I have heard all my life without a good study of Scripture. We have been told to occupy until the Lord comes, therefore I took it for granted that this was something that Paul taught in his Epistles to the church.

 

I was WRONG to take this for granted!

The term occupy till I come is found in one verse in the entire Bible.

Luke 19:13

And he called his ten servants, and delivered them ten pounds, and said unto them, Occupy till I come.

Now, in this passage we find Jesus giving a parable to His Jewish followers.

Let’s listen in as we look at Luke 19:1-28.

And Jesus entered and passed through Jericho.

And, behold, there was a man named Zacchaeus, which was the chief among the publicans, and he was rich.

And he sought to see Jesus who he was; and could not for the press, because he was little of stature.

And he ran before, and climbed up into a sycomore tree to see him: for he was to pass that way.

And when Jesus came to the place, he looked up, and saw him, and said unto him, Zacchaeus, make haste, and come down; for to day I must abide at thy house.

And he made haste, and came down, and received him joyfully.

And when they saw it, they all murmured, saying, That he was gone to be guest with a man that is a sinner.

And Zacchaeus stood, and said unto the Lord; Behold, Lord, the half of my goods I give to the poor; and if I have taken any thing from any man by false accusation, I restore him fourfold.

And Jesus said unto him, This day is salvation come to this house, forsomuch as he also is a son of Abraham.

For the Son of man is come to seek and to save that which was lost.

And as they heard these things, he added and spake a parable, because he was nigh to Jerusalem, and because they thought that the kingdom of God should immediately appear.

He said therefore, A certain nobleman went into a far country to receive for himself a kingdom, and to return.

And he called his ten servants, and delivered them ten pounds, and said unto them, Occupy till I come.

But his citizens hated him, and sent a message after him, saying, We will not have this man to reign over us.

And it came to pass, that when he was returned, having received the kingdom, then he commanded these servants to be called unto him, to whom he had given the money, that he might know how much every man had gained by trading.

Then came the first, saying, Lord, thy pound hath gained ten pounds.

And he said unto him, Well, thou good servant: because thou hast been faithful in a very little, have thou authority over ten cities.

And the second came, saying, Lord, thy pound hath gained five pounds.

And he said likewise to him, Be thou also over five cities.

And another came, saying, Lord, behold, here is thy pound, which I have kept laid up in a napkin:

For I feared thee, because thou art an austere man: thou takest up that thou layedst not down, and reapest that thou didst not sow.

And he saith unto him, Out of thine own mouth will I judge thee, thou wicked servant. Thou knewest that I was an austere man, taking up that I laid not down, and reaping that I did not sow:

Wherefore then gavest not thou my money into the bank, that at my coming I might have required mine own with usury?

And he said unto them that stood by, Take from him the pound, and give it to him that hath ten pounds.

(And they said unto him, Lord, he hath ten pounds.)

For I say unto you, That unto every one which hath shall be given; and from him that hath not, even that he hath shall be taken away from him.

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.

And when he had thus spoken, he went before, ascending up to Jerusalem.

We learn by reading this passage that Jesus is speaking to the Jews of His day a parable because they thought that the kingdom of God should immediately appear.

They are told to occupy until he comes because the kingdom of God was not going to appear immediately. The use of the word occupy in the parable connotes that they were to trade and do business with the money until the nobleman returned from his journey to where he was to receive a kingdom for himself. The nobleman left them with money to do business on his behalf. Jesus, in sharing this parable gave His followers a principle to follow. He was leaving them; He would come again, and they were to do business until he returned to bring His kingdom rule to earth.

This is a kingdom principle for Israel, and has nothing to do with we who are the new creation in Christ Jesus.

Can we benefit from “occupy till I come” in our daily Christian walk?

I believe we can, in that we need to be good stewards over what the Lord puts into our lives to watch over, be it finances, spouse, or children, etc. However, we need to follow the teachings of Paul in these areas. Husbands love your wives as Christ loves the church. Children obey your parents. Wives submit to your own husband, as unto the Lord. And all other areas our brother Paul penned that cause us to emulate Christ by the power of the Holy Spirit and obedience to God’s Word.

Imminent as used through the years implies that the Lord’s return is at hand, even at the door; it may occur at any moment.

I’m not going to say a whole lot about either of these terms except to say that each have been aped through the years without really being questioned; therefore we came to adopt these two terms for ourselves and have believed them to be factual. With that knowledge, when the NT was penned, I will say that many things had to occur before the Lord’s return was to transpire, so in that sense alone His return was not about to happen next. His return is more imminent now than it has ever been, but in the scope of the time where these statements were made and written in the NT Scripture - 2000 years of grace had to transpire before the resurrection/rapture could take place. The following Scripture will bear this out. It is speaking of our gathering together in the resurrection/rapture unto Christ.

II Thessalonians 2:1-3

Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him,

That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand.

Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;

Unfortunately the king James translators did a disservice to this portion of Scripture. The term the day of Christ should read the day of the Lord, and the falling away should be more clear i.e. a departing from someone or something to avoid persecution. This passage is not speaking of an apostasy i.e. falling away from faith in Christ Jesus, but separating from someone or something.

I’m not going to get deep into this in this offering because we have written on this subject ad nauseam.

The point is that Paul wrote this second letter to the church in Thessalonica because they were told and believed that the day of the Lord was already upon them. Due to the persecution they experienced as believers they just knew God’s judgment was already on the earth. Paul wrote to assure them that the day of the Lord had not begun. He said that first the resurrection/rapture must occur, second the falling away, and third - the man of sin would be revealed. Paul set the Thessalonians mind at rest that the resurrection/rapture had to take place before the day of the Lord could commence.

There is an appointed time for everything. The day of our departure was decided upon before the foundations of the world. The Second coming of Christ Jesus to Israel will follow on its planned schedule. We have shown through many teachings that the Lord is a God of order and that He repeats things on the very same time table that He has in the past. There is nothing new under the sun – what has been will also be again.

We have shared and believe that there is strong evidence that the resurrection/rapture will occur in the spring.

We receive progressive revelation and we share what we see at the time. The problem with this is that because the revelation of God’s Word is progressive we report what we see as a strong possibility, and then in time we see a bit more of the revelation. This is what has happened with the sabbatical cycles. They are a true benchmark and we see the truth about them as God has laid them out for us to say, yes, that happened on that 7th year and we can expect the Lord to follow in His order and patterns.

First we were shown the concept of the 7 candle Menorah and Jesus as the Servant candle in the middle 3.5 position. Next we were able to see the 9 candle Menorah and Jesus as the Servant candle in the middle 4.5 position…and other examples that point to the resurrection/rapture of the church body. We have no idea how many of you followed these articles and/or received any blessing from them - but, we shared them in the hope that your faith would be encouraged by the Lord’s orderly principles.

I told a friend some time ago that I was not fudging from the spring rapture ever again, and yet, I got caught off guard awhile back and got sucked into a new rapture date which was to occur a month or so ago. Well guess what, that day has come and gone. I see at different forums that the rapture is to take place in a day or two. That day too, will come and pass. The reason these rapture dates are all over the chart is because most watchers believe that the rapture is imminent, that it can occur at any moment. I’m sticking to the spring rapture that we concluded to believe in a year or so ago. If the Lord gives more progression to His revelation then I await that development, and I will continue to wait until He takes me in death or in the resurrection/rapture.

The resurrection/rapture is more at the door today than it has ever been at hand. It is more imminent today than any other time in history. Praise God, we are looking forward to this spring. If the Lord desires to prove us wrong and come today – we are all for it, but His order and His principles are just too reliable not to follow.

Do we stop watching?

We do not.

Do we occupy until He comes for us?

We obey God’s Word and we follow the instructions found in the NT Epistles to the church until He calls us home in death or in the resurrection/rapture.

1Timothy 6:14 That thou keep this commandment without spot, unrebukeable, until the appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ:

2Timothy 4:8 Henceforth there is laid up for me a crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous judge, shall give me at that day: and not to me only, but unto all them also that love his appearing.

Titus 2:13 Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ;

1Peter 1:7  That the trial of your faith, being much more precious than of gold that perisheth, though it be tried with fire, might be found unto praise and honour and glory at the appearing of Jesus Christ:

We watch, and we wait for His appearing.


I was asked to explain further on the term “falling away.”

Mark, I'm putting together another paper to "better" explain the portion in my writing that you are questioning in regards to the "falling away."

For now, I'll call upon Dr. Zodhiates to provide the Greek word understanding.

The word used there is apostasia
"the apostasy" which does not exactly mean that. The verb from which this substantive is derived is aphistemi, made up of the preposition apo, "from," and histemi, "to place or stand."

In its strict sense, it means to place oneself away from or to stand away from someone. It does not necessarily mean to remove oneself from someone or somewhere.

This separating from someone does not necessarily imply wholehearted agreement or disagreement, but it is separating oneself for purpose of not incurring the dangers of that association.

This implies that there are those who associate themselves with the faith but who in reality are not faithful. They might go to church, even be a Sunday school teacher. a church deacon, or even the pastor - but they are not really a born again believer in Christ Jesus. They might have head knowledge and be associated with Christians but not really a Christian. But, then, when persecution comes to the faithful - the one who is not invested in the faith departs as not to be associated with the true believer in order that they are not mistaken as a believer, thus incurring persecution themselves.

So then, the
"falling away" is a departing from someone or something in order to not be identified with someone or something to avoid danger or persecution.

This is the correct understanding of the use of the term
"falling away" from verse 3.

When I get my other article complete I hope to bring all the verses together in context.

Thnx, Mark for your question. You always keep me on my toes. Where I'm not clear, you challenge me.

I mentioned that I was not going to explain that portion because we have gone over it thoroughly in other writings, but I can see that by piling my thoughts one on top of the other has caused some confusion, therefore I will take more care to explain.

My intent was to explain that we take for granted words and terms
(imminent and occupy till I come) and we adopt them as fact without having a true understanding of there meaning. But for you Mark, and anyone else I might have left confused I will produce a more precise writing on this portion of Scripture.


(This final offering is the remainder of my explanation).

Let's go over this again in order that the subject is completely understood.

2 Thessalonians 2:

1 Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him,

2 That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ (the day of the Lord) is at hand.

3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day (the day of the Lord) shall not come, [1] except there come a falling away first, and [2] that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;

The first verse is speaking about our gathering together unto the Lord i.e. the catching away - where the dead in Christ will rise up first then we which are alive will be caught up together with them to meet the Lord Jesus in the air.

The second verse admonishes them that they should not be shaken that the day of the Lord is present i.e. already here.

Then the third verse speaks that the falling away and the revealing of the man of sin must both occur before the day of the Lord can come.

Now, after further study one must work from verse 3 and go backward to fully understand what is taking place and what our brother Paul is saying to these believers.

Before the Lord comes to Israel at His Second coming there will be a falling away, not from being in the Christian faith, and then departing from the faith, but rather removing oneself away from any form of association with God... And the man of sin must be revealed before the Lord comes to Israel.

But, before those events transpire the departure of those in Christ must occur.

The Scriptural departing from this earth to meet JESUS in the air.

Clearly, the first thing to happen is that all who are in Christ will be caught up together and depart from this earth to meet the Lord in the air at the resurrection/rapture (the departing actually means to be caught up by Someone other than ourselves in order to come into their presence, to meet them. It means to depart from one place to go meet someone who is coming toward us - i.e. responding to the action of another).

The next thing that Paul tells the Thessalonians is that there will be a falling away before the day of the Lord comes. And finally, that the man of sin must be revealed before the day of the Lord comes.

Something that needs to be understood is that the man of sin is not revealed until the middle of the 7 year tribulation; therefore we must step back and look at this from the entire 7 year perspective.

At the beginning of the 7 year tribulation the person who confirms the covenant is a man bringing about peace and security in the Middle East. He is not revealed as the man of sin until mid trib. We can see that right now in our time, there is a “falling away” from the principles of God, but the Bible tells us that there will be a “falling away” after those in Christ depart. It is evident that after the man of sin is revealed the falling away from the true God will increase all the way up until the Lord’s Second coming when He comes with the church saints who were caught up 7 years earlier.

Rather than me writing out things that I have written in the past let me insert here what Mr. Darby has surmised regarding this 2nd Epistle to the Thessalonians.

In the Second Epistle to the Thessalonians, the apostle corrects some errors into which these disciples had fallen with regard to the day of the Lord through certain false teachers; as in part of the first epistle he had enlightened the ignorance of the believers themselves respecting the portion of the saints at the coming of Christ to take them to Himself-a point on which they were evidently but little instructed.

A measure of Jewish darkness was on their minds; and they were, in some points, still subjected to the influence of that unhappy nation, which was ever struggling to maintain a position lost through its unbelief.

This Jewish influence enables us to understand why the apostle spoke as he did in chapter 2:15, 16 of the first Epistle. At that time this influence showed itself in the tendency of the Thessalonians to lose sight of the heavenly side of the Lord's coming, to think that He would return to the earth and that they should then be glorified with Him-as a Jew might have believed-and that the dead saints would therefore not be present to share this glory. I do not say that this thought had assumed a definite form in the minds of the Thessalonians. To them the principal and living object was the Lord Himself, and they were awaiting His return with hearts full of joy and life; but the heavenly side of this expectation had not its place clearly marked in their minds, and they connected the coming too much with the manifestation, so that the earthly character predominated, and the dead seemed to be shut out from it.

When the Second Epistle was written, this Jewish influence had another character; and the false teachers were more directly concerned in it.

The faithful at Thessalonica had learnt to contemplate "the day of the Lord" as a day of judgment. The Old Testament had spoken much of this day of the Lord, a day of darkness and unparalleled judgment, a day of trial to men. (Compare #Isaiah 13, #Amos 5:18)

Now the Thessalonians were undergoing dreadful persecution. Perhaps their hope of an earthly intervention of the Lord, during their lifetime, was weakened. The apostle at least rejoiced at the increase of their faith, and the abundant exercise of their love, while he is silent with regard to their hope; and the joy of Christian life is not found here as it was manifested in the First Epistle. Nevertheless they were walking well, and the apostle gloried in them.

In the First Epistle he says he needed not to speak of them, seeing that the world itself recounted everywhere the principles by which they were governed. We shall see a similar difference all through. It is no longer the same fresh energy of life in the churches of God. But the false teachers profited by their condition to mislead them by means of their sufferings, which weighed more heavily on their hearts from the joy of hope being a little weakened; and at the same time the remains of the influence of Judaising thoughts or of habits of mind formed through them, furnished occasion to the assaults of the enemy. The instrument of the subtle malice told them that the day of the Lord, that fearful time, was already come-the word (chap. 2: 2) is not "at hand," but "come," "present"

See #Romans 8:38 1Co 3:22; where it (enistemi) is translated "present," in contrast with "things to come."

-and all that the Thessalonians were suffering, and by which their hearts were shaken, appeared like a testimony to prove it and to confirm the words of the false teachers. Was it not written that it should be a day of trial and anguish?

The words of these teachers, moreover, had the pretension of being more than human reasoning; it was a word of the Lord, it was the Spirit who spoke, it was a letter from an inspired channel: and so bold and wicked were they in regard to this matter, that they did not fear to adduce the apostle's own name as their authority for declaring that the day was come. Now the dominion of fear, which Satan can exercise over the mind, when it is not kept of God in peace and joy, is astonishing. "In nothing terrified by your adversaries," is the apostle's word to the Philippians, "which is to them an evident token of perdition, but to you of salvation, and that of God." In such a state of mind as this everything is believed; or rather everything is feared, and nothing is believed. The heart gives itself up to this fear, and is ready to believe anything; for it is in darkness an knows not what to believe. Thus the apostle exhorts the Thessalonians (chap. 2) not to be soon shaken in mind so as to lose their stability in the truth, and not to be troubled.

The apostle deals with the case in the same manner as in the First Epistle. Before entering on the error he treats the same subject in its true light, building upon the knowledge which the Thessalonians already possessed. Only he sets it forth with clearness in its application to the circumstances of the moment. By this means they were delivered from the influence of the error, and from the disturbance of mind which it had caused; and were rendered capable of looking at the error, as being themselves outside it, and of judging it according to the instruction that the apostle gave them.

They were persecuted and were in distress and suffering and the enemy took advantage of it. The apostle puts that fact in its right place. He encourages them with the thought that it was a kind of seal upon them of their being worthy of the kingdom for which they were suffering. But more, the "day of the Lord" was the coming of the Lord in judgment; but it was not to make His own suffer that He was coming -it was to punish the wicked.

Persecution therefore could not be the day of the Lord; for in persecution the wicked had the upper hand and did their own will and inflicted suffering on those whom the Lord loved.

Could that be His day!

The apostle does not apply this argument to the question, but he puts the facts in their place; so that all the use which the enemy made of them fell of itself to the ground. The truth of the facts was there in its simplicity, giving them their evident and natural character. When God should take the thing in hand, He would recompense tribulation to those who troubled His children, and these should have rest-should be in peace. The moment of their entering into this rest is not at all the subject here, but the contrast between their actual condition and that which it would be if Jesus were come. It was not to persecute and harass His own that He was coming. In His day they should be at rest, and the wicked in distress; for He was coming to punish the latter by driving them away for ever from the glory of His presence.

When we understand that the Thessalonians had been induced to believe that the day of the Lord was already come, the import of this first chapter is very plain.

Two principles are here established.

First, the righteous judgment of God: it is righteous in His eyes, on the one hand, to reward those who suffer for His kingdom's sake: and, on the other, to requite those who persecute His children.

In the second place, the glorious manifestation of the Lord Jesus: His own should be in rest and happiness with Him, when His power should be in exercise.

We see also here two reasons for judgment-they did not know God, and they did not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ. All being without excuse as to the testimony that God had ever given concerning Himself, some among them had added the rejection of the positive revelation of His grace in the gospel of Christ to their abuse of their natural relationship with God and their forgetfulness of His majesty.

Meanwhile the apostle presents the positive result in blessing of the manifestation of Jesus in glory. He will come to be glorified in His saints, and to be admired in all them that have believed in Him, and therefore in the Thessalonians: a thorough proof, at least that they were not to view their persecuted condition as a demonstration that the day was come. With regard to themselves, they were thus entirely delivered from the confusion by which the enemy sought to disquiet them; and the apostle could treat the question of this error with hearts which, as to their own condition, were set free from it and at rest.

These considerations characterized his prayers on their behalf. He sought from God that they might always be worthy of this vocation, and that the Lord might be glorified in them by the power of faith, which would shine the brighter through their persecutions; and that afterwards they might be glorified in Him at the manifestation of His glory according to the grace of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ.

Now that the apostle has placed their souls on the ground of truth, he enters upon the subject of the error, showing that which had occasioned his remarks. Of this we have already spoken.

Their gathering together unto Christ in the air was a demonstration of the impossibility of the day of the Lord being already come.

Moreover with regard to this last he presents two considerations: first, the day could not be already come, since Christians were not yet gathered to the Lord, and they were to come with Him; second, the wicked one who has then to be judged had not yet appeared, so that the judgment could not be executed.

The apostle had already instructed the Thessalonians with regard to this wicked one, when at Thessalonica; and in the former epistle he had taught them concerning the rapture of the church. In order that the Lord should come in judgment, iniquity must have reached its height, and open opposition to God have been manifested. But the truth had another and more precious side: the saints were to be in the same position as Christ, to be gathered together unto Him, before He could manifest Himself in glory to those outside. But these truths require a more connected examination.

Their gathering together unto Christ before the manifestation was a truth known to the Thessalonians; it is not revealed here, it is used as an argument. The Lord Jesus was coming, but it was impossible that He should be without His church in the glory. The King would indeed punish His rebellious subjects; but, before doing so, He would bring to Himself those who had been faithful to Him amid the unfaithful, in order to bring them back with Him and publicly to honor them in the midst of the rebels. But the apostle here speaks only of the rapture itself, and he adjures them only by that truth not to allow themselves to be shaken in mind as though the day were come. What an assured truth must this have been to Christians, since the apostle could appeal to it as to a known point, on which the heart could rest! The relationship of the church to Christ, its being necessarily in the same position with Him rendered the idea that the day was already come a mere folly.

In the second place, the already known fact is asserted, that the apostasy must previously take place, and then the man of sin be revealed. Solemn truth! Everything takes its place. The forms and the name of Christianity have long been maintained; true Christians have been disowned; but now there should be a public renunciation of the faith-an apostasy. True Christians should have their true place in heaven. But, besides this, there should be a person who would fully realize in sin the character of man without God. He is the man of sin. He does his own will-it is but Adam fully developed; and incited by the enemy, he opposes himself to God (it is open enmity against God), and he exalts himself above all that bears the name of God; he assumes the place of God in His temple. So that there is apostasy, that is, the open renunciation of Christianity in general, and an individual who concentrates in his own person (as to the principles of iniquity) the opposition that is made against God.

This man of sin exalts himself above God, and, sitting as God in the temple of God, he defies the God of Israel. This last feature gives his formal character. He is in conflict with God, as placing himself publicly in this position-showing himself as God in the temple of God. It is the God of Israel who will take vengeance on him.

The apostle had already told them of the apostasy, and of the manifestation of the man of sin. He now says that the Thessalonians ought to know the hindrance that existed to his progress and his manifestation before the appointed time. He does not say that he had told them, but they ought to know it. Knowing the character of the wicked one, the barrier revealed itself. The main point here is that it was a barrier. The principle of the evil was already at work: a barrier alone prevented its development. Its character when developed would be unbridled will which exalts and opposes itself.

Note this point. All was ready and complete in the apostle's time, only restrained. So Christ was ready to judge. Only the patience of God waits, in the accepted time.

Now when the assembly (the assembly, that is, as composed of the true members of Christ) is gone, and consequently the Holy Ghost as the Comforter is no longer dwelling here below, then the apostasy takes place.

(Note: the Holy Spirit will no longer dwell as the Comforter because this was His ministry to the church until the church is removed from earth to be with the Lord. The Holy Spirit will still be here, but not in the role of the Comforter). De

The principle of this may be widely at work individually, as in #1John 2, it had begun, but the open public manifestation was to come. Jude gives the creeping in to produce corruption John, the going out which characterizes the Antichrist.

The time to remove the hindrance is come, the evil is unbridled, and at length (without saying how much time it will take) the evil assumes a definite shape in him who is its head. The beast comes up from the abyss. Satan -not God-gives him his authority; and in the second beast all the energy of Satan is present. The man of sin is there.

 

There was more commentary by Darby but I have only shown that which applies to the subject in question.

The bottom line is that Paul was teaching the Thessalonians that the day of the Lord had not come and gave the reasons why.

From the context, the day of the Lord spoken of is the time of the 7 year tribulation culminating with the Second coming of Christ when He will fight the battle we call Armageddon.

1.)   The resurrection/rapture

2.)   The falling away

3.)   The man of sin revealed

4.)   The Second coming (Christ with us)

5.)   The battle of Armageddon

The first three things must take place before the Second coming of Christ, and then He does battle, and then He sets up His KINGDOM on earth.

This entire mix up could have been avoided had the King James translators known more. Some portions of Scripture are difficult to understand, and if we don’t seek out the root meanings in the original language we can become confused. This is exactly why we have so many different beliefs about the rapture of the church. Is it pre-trib, mid-trib, or post-trib? And of course we have many who believe that the church has replaced Israel, and much more improper Scriptural exegesis. I read briefly from a site today where they profess to know Christ as their Savior and yet - believe in reincarnation.

I hope this has sufficiently answered your question Mark. But before I conclude, I do want to talk a tiny bit more about my original intent.

The imminent return of the Lord:

I can’t say for sure but the imminent return of Christ for the church may have begun because of the Scripture that speaks of Jesus coming suddenly at His Second coming.

Mark 13:

34  For the Son of man is as a man taking a far journey, who left his house, and gave authority to his servants, and to every man his work, and commanded the porter to watch.

35 Watch ye therefore: for ye know not when the master of the house cometh, at even, or at midnight, or at the cockcrowing, or in the morning:

36 Lest coming suddenly he find you sleeping.

37 And what I say unto you I say unto all, Watch.

What I take from this is that the ones spoken to should be ready. They should be in a spirit of readiness for the Lord’s Second coming lest when He comes He find them in a spirit of slumber.

The word suddenly is exaiphnes  (pronounced) ex-ah'-eef-nace and it means unexpectedly. In other words they were told to be working and watching until the return of the Son of man to Israel when He would set up His kingdom on earth – Israel being the head and not the tail. He was telling them to not be caught unawares; keep the return of the Son of man ever before you, else His return would be unexpected and unforeseen if they did not stay in a readiness position toward His return.

In conclusion:

The disciples were taught to expect the Son of man to return and that they were to work and do business (occupy) while maintaining a posture of readiness and looking forward to the Second coming else He would come when they least expected Him.

The Lord’s Second coming will come suddenly on those whose posture is quiet unconcern.

These men will be surprised.

The ones watching (a remnant) will not be surprised because they will know the signs to be watching for.

They will count the days.